CHRIS ARGYRIS Knowledge in Action. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1993 |
MODEL I |
|
||
Governing variables for action | Action strategies for the individual and toward his/her environment | Consequences on the individual and his/her
environment
|
Consequences on learning | Effectiveness |
Y Controls the purpose of the meeting or encounter. | Design and manage environment so that the individual (Y) is in control over the factors relevant to him/her, not X. Advocate your (Y) position | Individual (X) becomes defensive | Self-sealing | Decreased effectiveness |
Y Maximize winning and minimize losing
|
Own and control task (Y) | Defensive interpersonal and group relations (X) |
Little public testing of theories |
|
Minimize eliciting negative
feelings from X
|
Evaluate the thoughts and actions of others (Y does so with X) | Defensive norms |
Lots of saving face | |
Y maximizes rationality and minimizes emotionality (Y) | Unilaterally protect others from being hurt (easing in by Y) | Low freedom of choice, internal commitment and risk taking (by X) |
Little learning or problem solving (except about how to protect self) |
CHRIS ARGYRIS |
MODEL II |
|||||
Governing variables for action | Action strategies for the individual and toward his/her environment | Consequences on the individual and his/her environment | Consequences on learning | |||
Valid (confirmable) information | Situations or encounters are designed to enable participants to originate actions and experience high personal causation | Individual is minimally defensive | Ownership and commitment | |||
Free and informed choice | Descriptive, paraphrase, unconditional positive regard, listening for feelings, seeking to understand from other's point of view | Minimally defensive interpersonal and group dynamics | Double-loop learning | |||
Internal commitment to the choice and constant monitoring of implementations | Task is controlled
jointly Protection of self is bilateral directed toward growth |
Learning oriented norms | Frequent public testing of theories |