Last updated
12/14/06
RETURN TO HOMEPAGE
Important Information
Organizational Behavior
F2006
R 7:00-9:45
THE COURSE
The purpose of the course is to help
students understand organizations and to take effective action in them.
The field of organization behavior includes a number of different conceptual
perspectives. We will view organizations through four lenses (frames) that encompass much of the existing theory and research on organizations. The idea of
"reframing" guides our learning; the four major
diagnostic points of views are: the structural, the human resource,
the political, and the symbolic frames. This organizing
schema, developed by
Lee Bolman of our Bloch faculty and Terrence Deal, is the basis
for their book, Reframing Organizations. Each frame derives from
different
assumptions about organizations and each advocates different avenues for
action. These four frames encompass much of the existing theory and research
about organizations and thus provide comprehensive and integrated ways to
understand behavior in organizations. The course builds on the idea that one's ability
to diagnose and engage in successful organizational behavior is enhanced by "multi-frame"
thinking and action. The four frames provide perspectives
relevant across all kinds of organizations: churches, athletic teams, clubs,
universities, sororities, hospitals, nonprofit organizations, government
agencies, businesses, and even this class.
SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES OF THE COURSE.
TEXT
L. Bolman and T. Deal, Reframing Organizations: Artistry, Choice, and Leadership. (3rd ed.) San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2003. Be sure to purchase the third edition.
HOW WE'LL OPERATE
This course website is deep and thick. Know what is here. Answers to most questions about the class can be found here. If you remain dumfounded, contact the prof.
Activities of the class are organized around the knowledge and skills of "four-frame analysis and action."
You will join others in a learning team and complete an Organizational Field Study (OFS), a major aspect of the course. The learning teams face the challenging task of using and integrating the frames by conducting a hands-on OFS where theory meets practice in a "real" organization. Someone in your group will identify the organization to diagnosis. The following links describe the OFS:
FORMAL REQUIREMENTS
GRADE %'s and DUE DATES
Guidelines and Grading Instructions Summary | % Grade | Graded Deliverables |
Exam 1 and What happens if you miss it |
20% | Exam #1 Oct. 5 |
Exam 2 and What happens if you miss it |
30% Total
20% for multiple
choice, T/F |
Exam #2 Dec. 14 |
Organizational Field Study (OFS) Paper OFS Work Plan including sample formal contract letter
OFS
Presentation
OFS Class Evaluation of Presentation Form In some extraordinary circumstances a student my wish to not engage in group graded activities. See or call me for details no later than the second class. |
35% Total 5% Peer Assessment Form , by peers 20%
Evaluation Form used by Prof to Eval OFS Paper 5% Presentation eval. is made by Prof. with same form used by the class |
OFS Paper Due
12/7 OFS Presentations
|
Attendance, Participation and Helpful Norms | 15% | na |
Total | 100% | na |
Twenty sections of BMA505 over the last 15 years show a grade distribution of 24% A, 64% B, 8%C, 3%D, 1%F (N=520). Basically this means that 1 in 4 can expect an A, 2 of 3 can expect a B, and the remaining small balance, to varying degrees, either don't belong or don't want to be in graduate school. UMKC policy prohibits publicly posting grades. They are available online. Let me know anytime during the course if you'd like to know your grade status. I use +/- grading. UMKC and Bloch have attendance and grading policies. Find and read copies. No changes will be made to final grades after they are submitted to Academic Records at the end of the semester. The only exceptions are if you have made prior arrangements with me to take an "incomplete" for the semester or I have made an error in calculating your grade. Of course, you may always appeal any instructor's grade if you believe "capricious grading" occurred by following Bloch and UMKC guidelines for appeal.
OTHER IMPORTANT STUFF