Important Information
Organizational Behavior
F2006
R 7:00-9:45
THE COURSE
The purpose of the course is to help
students understand organizations and to take effective action in them.
The field of organization behavior includes a number of different conceptual
perspectives. We will view organizations through four lenses (frames) that encompass much of the existing theory and research on organizations. The idea of
"reframing" guides our learning; the four major
diagnostic points of views are: the structural, the human resource,
the political, and the symbolic frames. This organizing
schema, developed by Lee Bolman
of our Bloch faculty and Terrence Deal, is the foundation
for their book, Reframing Organizations. Each frame derives from
different
assumptions about organizations and each advocates different avenues for
action. These four frames encompass much of the existing theory and research
about organizations and thus provide comprehensive and integrated ways to
understand behavior in organizations. The course builds on the idea that one's ability
to diagnose and engage in successful organizational behavior is enhanced by "multi-frame"
thinking and action. The four frames provide perspectives
relevant across all kinds of organizations: churches, athletic teams, clubs,
universities, sororities, hospitals, nonprofit organizations, government
agencies, businesses, and even this class.
SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES OF THE COURSE.
TEXTS
L. Bolman and T. Deal, Reframing Organizations: Artistry, Choice, and Leadership. (3rd ed.) San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2003. Be sure to purchase the third edition
R. Fisher and W. Ury, Getting to Yes. Second Edition. New York: Penguin Books, 1991
HOW WE'LL OPERATE
Activities of the class are organized around the skills of "four-frame analysis and action."
You will join a learning team in which you will work to understand each of the four frames. In the learning teams, you face the challenging task of using and integrating the frames by conducting a hands-on Organizational Field Study (OFS) where theory meets practice in a "real" organization. Someone in your group will identify an organization to diagnosis. See: Organization Field Study Work Plan OFS Presentation. You'll provide a portion of the grade of OFS for your fellow group mates and they, you. See: On Sharing Part of the Grade with Others. See also: Peer Assessment Form and Guidelines and Grading Instructions Summary. You will also take peer assisted assessment exams in your learning teams. See Assessments
FORMAL REQUIREMENTS
GRADE %'s and DUE DATES
Guidelines and Grading Instructions Summary | % Grade | Graded Deliverables |
Exams and What happens if you miss one |
20% each, 40% total | Assessment
#1 10/13 Assessment #2 12/15 |
Organizational Field Study (OFS) Paper OFS Work Plan including sample formal contract letter OFS
Presentation In some extraordinary circumstances a student may be unable to not engage in group graded activities. See or call me for details no later than the second class. |
35% Total
10% guidelines for peer evaluation 20 % paper and 5% presentation, total 25% by prof. |
OFS Paper 12/8 Presentations:
Groups 1,2,3 and Groups 4,5,6 |
Getting to Yes (CB) Paper You may share the authorship of the paper with other members of your group or others in the class. If you do, all will receive the same grade for the paper. Or you may write the paper yourself. The group effort is optional and does not need to be your learning team. | 10% | 10/27 |
Attendance and Participation | 15% | na |
Total | 100% | na |
Twenty sections of BMA505 over the last 15 years show a grade distribution of 24% A, 64% B, 8%C, 3%D, 1%F (N=520). Basically this means that 1 in 4 can expect an A, 2 of 3 can expect a B, and the remaining small balance, to varying degrees, either don't belong or don't want to be in graduate school. UMKC policy prohibits publicly posting grades. Let me know anytime during the course if you'd like to know your grade status. I use +/- grading. See Grades.
OTHER IMPORTANT STUFF