"What's up? I've been down."
Important Information
Organizational Behavior
BMA505
W2004
MW 7:00-9:45
OBJECTIVES OF THE COURSE
TEXTS
L. Bolman and T. Deal, Reframing Organizations: Artistry, Choice, and Leadership. (3rd ed.) San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2003. Be sure to purchase the third ediiton
R. Fisher and W. Ury, Getting to Yes. Second Edition. New York: Penguin Books, 1991.
A. Lansing, Endurance: Shackleton's Incredible Voyage, 1986.
THE ORGANIZING SCHEMA
The course is about leadership and "reframing" organizations.
Reframing.
We learn about multiple-frame thinking and action and reframing organizations.
The idea of reframing organizations has four major diagnostic points of views: the structural, the human resource, the political,
and the symbolic frames. This organizing schema,
developed by Lee Bolman
of our Bloch faculty and Terry
Deal, is the foundation for their book, Reframing Organizations.
Each frame derives from different assumptions and beliefs ("theories") about
organizations and each advocates different avenues for action. These four frames
encompass much of the existing theory and research about organizations and thus
provide comprehensive and integrated ways to understand behavior in
organizations, especially leadership behavior.
The four
frames provide perspectives relevant across all kinds of organizations:
churches, athletic teams, clubs, universities, sororities, hospitals, nonprofit
organizations, government agencies, and businesses and even this class.
Many activities of the class are organized around the
skills of "four-frame analysis."
Leadership
We apply the ideas of Reframing to a case of leadership in action (A. Lansing, Endurance: Shackleton's Incredible Voyage).
The ideas in Getting to Yes allow us to explore more fully aspects of Reframing.
Here is a statement about reframing as I understand it.
The course is about "reframing" organizations, a multiple-frame way to think about organizations and to develop action and action strategies in leading them.
The idea of reframing organizations has four major diagnostic points of views: the structural, the human resource, the political,
and the symbolic frames. This organizing schema,
developed by Lee Bolman
of our Bloch faculty and Terrence Deel is the foundation for their book, Reframing Organizations.
Each frame derives from different assumptions and beliefs ("theories") about
organizations and each advocates different avenues for action. These four frames
encompass much of the existing theory and research about organizations and thus
provide comprehensive and integrated ways to understand behavior in
organizations, especially leadership behavior. (The
assumptions of each frame.)
The four
frames provide perspectives relevant across all kinds of organizations:
churches, athletic teams, clubs, universities, sororities, hospitals, nonprofit
organizations, government agencies, and businesses and even this class.
Many activities of the class are organized around the
skills of "four-frame analysis."
FORMAL REQUIREMENTS
GRADE %'s and DUE DATES
Guidelines and Grading Instructions Summary | % Grade | Due Dates
for Graded Deliverables |
Espoused Theory of Leadership Paper | 5% | Jan. 26 |
Final Leadership Paper | 5% | Apr. 12 |
Assessments What happens if you miss the assessment. |
25% each, 50% total | Assessment
#1 Mar. 15 Assessment# 2 Monday May 3 8:00-10:00PM exam schedule |
Organizational Field Study (OFS) Paper On Sharing Part of the Grade with Others. Let me know by noon 1-27 (call) if you plan to not be part of a an OFS study group. Then by 2-2 submit a written proposal for how you might meet this requirement by class . |
25% Total
10% by peer Peer Assessment Form. 15 % paper and presentation, by prof. |
OFS Paper Apr. 26 Presentations Apr. 12, 19 and 26 |
Getting to Yes
(CB) Paper
You may share the authorship of the
paper with other members of your group or class. If you do, all will receive
the same grade for the paper. Or you may write the paper yourself. The
group effort is optional.
|
5% | April 5. |
Attendance and Participation | 10% | na |
Total | 100% | na |
There is no grading curve in this course. Twenty sections of BMA505 over 15 years show a grade distribution of 24% A, 65% B, 7%C, 3%D, 1%F (N=520). Basically this means that 1 in 4 can expect an A, 2 of 3 can expect a B, and the balance, to varying degrees, either don't belong or don't want to be in graduate school. UMKC policy prohibits publicly posting grades. Let me know anytime you'd like to know your grade status. Call UMKC student info at 816-444-8008 at the end of the semester for your grade. I use +/- grading.
OTHER IMPORTANT STUFF